Book Notes: Humphrey, “Scripture and Tradition”

Disclaimers

About This Log

About These Notes: These notes stretch across intellectual, spiritual, social, and psychological phases, from college years to the present. Do not presume their content (whether quotes, summaries, or commentary) or tone reflect my current interests, views, or disposition. Note also that these notes are selective and do not indicate all the books I have read (since many were not worth taking notes from, or I simply failed to for whatever reason), or even which books I have taken notes from (since many were hand-written and lost, or have not yet become digitized). I publish these notes to more widely and conveniently disseminate potentially useful information to others. Finally, out of necessity, respect, and clarity, each entry in this log category begins with a full citation of the source material, with quotations and page numbers clearly indicated throughout. Quotations were to the best of my ability and knowledge but are undoubtedly fallible; I am not responsible if any errors in these notes are uncritically repeated in other publications. You, the reader and referencer of this work, are responsible for ensuring the integrity of the material by consulting the primary source yourself and not relying on these notes. If you cannot verify the integrity of such primary source quotations and material on your own publications, it is necessary, for your own protection, to cite the material from these notes in the standard format of “…cited in…”, and reference this log as appropriate.

Most Relevant Audience: Anyone interested in the Bible and church tradition and relationships between them.

Date: 3/25/2016

Edith Humphrey, Scripture and Tradition: What the Bible Really Says (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2013),

On translation of “tradition” 34

Contradictions in OT tradition 37-38

O traditions are “reread, modified, interpreted, and, in these ways, passed on.” 47

  • Chronicler

“The New Testament writings themselves do not give undue value to writing over other means of communication…the Bible itself, whether the Old Testament or the New, does not make a distinction between Scripture and Tradition in terms of what is written over against what is oral. Jesus critiques the Pharisees for neglecting the weightier matters of the Torah, not for having oral traditions. The Torah, Paul suggests, can be used so that it becomes a dead letter or a veil over the face.” 62

“God works not just top down but also bottom up.” 101

“…the Holy spirit is not bound to an ‘original’ language of transmission.” 148

“it is impossible to detach Scripture from the living Tradition of the Church and pay attention only to the written canon.” 149

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *